An ingenious Spanish town near Madrid has come up with a seemingly foolproof way to keep its city clean of dog poop: they send it back to the dogs’ owners!
Brunete faced a growing nuisance as more people failed to pick up after their pets, and the sidewalks and parks bore the brunt. The town’s council could not fund a long term street cleaning program, but McCann, an advertising company, offered to do the work without charge. The gesture caught the eye of local leaders and residents alike, sparking conversations about responsibility, community pride, and pragmatic solutions.
With help from about twenty volunteers, teams patrolled the streets looking for unattended waste. When a dog walker left a mess, a volunteer would approach politely and ask for the dog’s breed and name. Using that information, the team could locate the owner in the pet registry and verify ownership. The aim was not punishment alone but to create a teachable moment that connected personal accountability with public space.
The volunteers then collected the waste, sealed it in suitable packaging, and mailed it back to the owner, accompanied by a notice inside a box marked Lost Property. The message reminded the recipient that their pet’s waste had been found and that a fine would follow if the behavior did not change. The approach drew attention for its unexpected, almost theatrical, twist and quickly became a talking point across the town. The result appeared to be a change in behavior, as more residents began to clean up after their dogs.
Readers may wonder about the outcome of such a tactic. Some say it was a clever, visible way to address a common nuisance without heavy-handed fines or bureaucratic rules. Others worry about privacy and potential misidentification or the delivery of waste into the hands of the wrong person. Nonetheless, authorities report a noticeable improvement in street cleanliness and a reduction in complaints after the program began. Citation: Brunete municipal records.
Beyond the novelty value, the case raises questions about public space, personal responsibility, and the limits of shaming as a policy tool. Critics argue that while the stunt may capture attention, it could backfire if people view it as humiliating rather than helpful. Advocates point out that it creates a concrete consequence tied to a real nuisance and invites owners to consider the impact of their actions on neighbors, pedestrians, and pets alike.
Compared with more traditional approaches such as fines, signage, or education campaigns, Brunete’s plan stands out for its directness and storytelling potential. It demonstrates how a municipal challenge can become a catalyst for community conversation and behavior change, especially when a private partner lends support at no cost. The broader lesson is simple: when everyday behavior affects public spaces, fresh ideas paired with practical follow-up can prompt consistent improvements. What do you think of this unusual method for teaching accountability to dog owners?